Monday, 5 January 2015

History of the Rain by Niall Williams/ Bloomsbury

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II

Also available as an audiobook from Audible Studios.
Click to listen the sample audio
Powered by
Bedridden bookworm, Ruth Swain, spins a story focused on the paternal genealogy of her family aided by the insights from the inhabitants of her rural Irish village and some famous literary characters.

I am not surprised that this book made the long list for the ManBooker 2014. Niall Williams has created a work which is both deeply insightful, emotionally rich, evoking universal themes through a parochial lens and above all it is so beautifully written that you could imagine that each sentence might have taken a week to sculpt.

While it is set in the present day the story has a classic edge and is told by the agoraphobic, ill-stricken and well-read narrator Ruth as she occupies her time in the attic of her family home trying to paint a literary picture of her father. To do this she explains, she must begin with her Great-Grand Father. We are treated to their rich history which she patches together by borrowing from voices of long dead authors.

Ruth’s narrative is full of lovely ironic humour which underlines the regret she feels her ancestors sensed about their own offspring.

Even though the story is set in post-economic-bust Ireland the style is classic in nature. It is a first person internal monologue from the self-confessed unreliable narration from Ruth. She admits very early on that she knows little about her ancestors but manages to bring them alive through the many references from literary authors, their characters and gossipy allusions from the ‘real’ people who live in her village of Faha. It is these devices which breathes life and grounds William’s novel and its main character.

Like a song the music of the sentences lures you in and like a river the winding story carries you to the end.

Her own character is an amalgam influence of the classic texts of Charles Dickens and Robert Louis Stevenson to which she alludes often. She is externally bitter at her confinement but her softly jumbled internal voice proves that lives can be lived and created through literature. Ruth Swain’s character exemplifies the differences between the way people think and the way we act.

This is a novel about seeking and revealing truths about the world, about families, about community, about isolation, the overcoming of obstacles, loss and about writing.

As well as all of the above “History of the Rain” is a novel that speaks directly to readers and writers about how stories are put together. The allusions to literary characters are treated in such a way that readers familiar with them will warm to their memories but Williams introduces them with a style that will not alienate those unfamiliar with the texts. This combined with the narrator’s comic use of the colloquialisms from her neighbours throughout the story makes the novel in some ways a subtle guide to writing.

He is proving the point that he makes in this sentence which arrives toward the end of the novel.

“Each book is the sum of all the others the writer has read”.

This is a wonderful sum.

Reviewed by Benjamin Moore
Benjamin Moore is a writer/blogger and reviewer. He lives in Ireland.

The Narrow Road to the Deep North by Richard Flanagan/ Vintage

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II
Winner
Also available as an audiobook from Audible Studios.
Click to listen the sample audio
Powered by


All hope abandon, ye who enter here.

Even Dante Alighieri’s fervent imagination could not have conjured the hell that was the “Line,” the Burma Death Railway built by Allied POWs and Asian slaves during World War II. Military surgeon Dorrigo Evans is our Virgil, leading us through the underworld of cruelty along that The Narrow Road to the Deep North.

This novel was recently awarded the Man Booker Prize. Like the two previous winners (The Luminaries, by Eleanor Catton; Bring Up the Bodies, by Hilary Mantel), the committee favored a work of historical fiction with a complicated structure (though nothing can compare to the kaleidoscopic corkscrews of The Luminaries) and a strong narrative voice, or in the case of The Narrow Road to the Deep North and The Luminaries, a multiplicity of voices.

The framework of this novel is built around Dorrigo Evans, whom we meet as a child in Tasmania. His intellect lifts him from the wild and desolate island into university and an officer’s station during the war, but no privilege can spare Dorrigo the depravations of the Japanese army.

The narrative moves nimbly between past and present. Dorrigo Evans looks back on his life from the perch of old age, reflecting, “A happy man has no past, while an unhappy man has nothing else.” And it cannot be said that Dorrigo is a happy man. Ironically, he is a legend, a national hero, for having survived the forced labor camps in the Thai-Burma jungle that killed over 90,000 Asian civilian laborers and 13,000 Allied POWs (I have read so many conflicting figures that I hesitate to assign real numbers to the casualties, but these are the most consistent. The scale of horror exceeds the imagination). But even before his military service, Dorrigo holds the world arm’s length. He exudes a cynic’s distrust and reserve. Perhaps it is this essence of distance that allows him to survive the labor camps with his mind intact, but he returns to the world with an almost sociopathic regard for personal relationships. He is a serial philanderer, cheating even on his mistresses. And there is shadowy mention of questionable medical ethics. Flanagan does this amazing thing of taking a cipher and baring his soul, to show us that our heroes are deeply flawed human beings, potentially ruined by the very events that made us venerate them.

Through the decades following the war he felt his spirit sleeping, and though he tried hard to rouse it with the shocks and dangers of consecutive and sometimes concurrent adulteries, outbursts, and acts of pointless compassion and reckless surgery, it did no good.

As the novel enters the war and thrusts us into that fetid jungle, we enter the lives of many in Evans’ troop, these “cobbers” who cling to one another for survival. Rooster MacNeice, Darky Gardiner, Sheephead Morton, Bonox Baker—names and identities so quintessentially Aussie—laconic but good-natured men accustomed to hard labor and few luxuries. What awaits them, and the reader, in the Japanese POW camps is beyond all comprehension.

But we do try to comprehend, don’t we? That is why we read—to understand what it is we cannot imagine on our own. As I read the unspeakable, my inner voice cried, Why? How? How can any man do to another what these Japanese soldiers did to the railway laborers? Dorrigo Evans seeks to understand, too.

At that moment he admired the terrible will of Nakamura—admired it more even than he despaired of the beating of Darky Gardiner—the grim strength, the righteous obedience to codes of honour that allowed no doubt.

But is this explanation enough? This sense of duty, a warrior’s code of honor? There is no reason in war, as Flanagan shows us; there is only what is, and what must be endured.

he grasped the truth of a terrifying world in which one could not escape horror… the world did not change, this violence had always existed and would never be eradicated, men would die under the boot and fists and horror of other men until the end of time, and all human history was a history of violence.

In a twist of narrative I wasn’t expecting and was reluctant to give myself over to, Flanagan takes us into the world of Major Nakamura, the camp commander who was responsible for so much of the torture inflicted upon Evans’ men. We are led into the post-war Inferno of Tokyo after surrender, a city in ruins, where Nakamura is hunted as a war criminal. Rather than seeking to elicit sympathy for Nakamura, Flanagan shows what doing evil does to a human being born, as we all are, without a blemish.

I’m just not capable of presenting all the moral voyages a reader will experience along The Narrow Road to the Deep North or articulating the subtle power of this book’s construction and its prose. These are beyond this lay reader's ability.

I’m also not capable of rereading the novel, though I wish I could, simply to learn from Richard Flanagan’s incredible skill. It nearly broke me the first time. Tremendous, tremendous work of literature.

Reviewed by Julie Christine Johnson

An intense reader and creative writer, she lives in Port Townsend, Washington. 

Sunday, 4 January 2015

J by Howard Jacobson/ Random House

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II

Shortlisted for
Also available as an audiobook from Audible Studios.
Click to listen the sample audio
Powered by
German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel once said, “We learn from history that we don’t learn from history,” which, besides being a clever bit of wordplay, is also profoundly true.

Those that believe that the Holocaust could never happen again---HERE and NOW---are clearly delusional and/or naively optimistic. A rising tide of Neo-Nazism in Europe, growing anti-semitic hostilities in the Middle East, the Islamic State a.k.a. ISIS: anyone with eyes and ears can see the same nationalism and racial hatred that bred the monsters of Germany in the 1930s.

Today, on many city streets worldwide, small race wars continually play out between trigger-happy cops and angry black teens, with neither group willing to listen to the other. Whether it’s black vs. white, straight vs. gay, conservative vs. liberal, Gentile vs. Jew, Christian vs. Muslim, it’s the same old hostilities playing out in the same old horrible ways.

Hegel was right. If we have learned nothing else from history, it’s that we have learned nothing from history. This is why Howard Jacobson’s latest novel, “J”, is so apropos.

Jacobson’s novel envisions a future supposedly several generations removed from our present and yet near enough to be terrifyingly prescient.

In this future, the past is nonexistent. Nostalgia is illegal. Popular media is watered-down to sentimentalist pap. Certain topics are not to be discussed. Specific events in history never happened, according to official reports. It is like this to protect the populace from a horrific truth; an attempt to erase from the collective unconscious an event so bad that it is referred to as WHAT HAPPENED, IF IT HAPPENED.

The utopic peace is gradually unravelling, though. Neighborly resentments are creeping into the idyllic towns and villages. Suppressed hostilities and incidents of rage and violence are slowly on the rise. Murder---a crime thought to be virtually eliminated---has returned.

The average citizen is at a loss to understand what is happening. Kevern Cohen, a college professor and amateur carpenter, is one such citizen. He has just met and fallen in love with the woman of his dreams, Ailinn Solomons. He is also a minor suspect in the murder of another local woman. He has no idea that he is actually the subject of a government-sanctioned experiment.
Part “Truman Show” and part “1984”, “J” extrapolates a dystopic future wherein society faces the consequences of a regrettable decision made by its ancestors and tries to correct and unsettling.

Hidden within plain sight in the novel is the future plight of the Jewish people. It’s not good. Nowhere in the novel does Jacobson ever use the words “Jew” or its variations or the word “holocaust”: perhaps the first clue. The second major clue lies in the title.

Whenever Kevern utters a word that starts with the letter “j”, he involuntarily puts his finger in front of his mouth, as if shushing himself. He doesn’t know why he does this. His father and mother always did it, and he learned the behavior from them, but he has never really questioned it. Intuitively, he knows it has something to do with WHAT HAPPENED, IF IT HAPPENED, but he doesn’t want to examine it too fully. To do so is not only frightening, it’s also illegal. It doesn’t, however, stop Ailinn from investigating the strange behavioral tics of the man she loves. Of course, what they both discover is something that neither could have imagined.

Jacobson’s tightly-constructed novel unravels itself like a murder mystery. It’s a suspenseful and intriguing thriller and, at the same time, a brilliant speculative examination of irrational hatred on a global level. It is not implausible. Indeed, its plausibility is what makes it such an important book.

Reviewed by Scott Richard Rhee
Scott lives in Cleveland, Ohio. 

How to be Both by Ali Smith/ Penguin Books

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II
Shortlisted for
Also available as an audiobook from Audible Studios.
Click to listen the sample audio
Powered by
This clever, very clever, novel is made out of the stuff of life. Here we have the usual suspects: time, language, love and art; four of them. And as it is about life, it is also about death.

Time in which the past and future intertwine in the fleeting present, Love fledging its most admirable redeeming abilities, Language as the malleable communicator that sometimes fails, Art in its ability to fascinate and enchant.

With death always lurking…

Its structure is paramount. It has two strands: one and one, or one and one. They differ from each other in that one is about Eyes and the other is about Cameras and that the stories are different. Also in that one is set in today’s world and the other in 15th Century Ferrara. Both are about looking; looking through disembodied eyes or through additional devices that come with extended memory. Randomly, the individual volumes, when printed, will come as Eyes + Cameras or Cameras + Eyes. For the electronic format randomness has been substituted by repetition. They have included the two combinations. I fell in that trap since when I thought I was in the exact middle of the novel, I was faced with its doubling mirror. Was I supposed to travel back in my reading to its beginning? Or did I feel as if life had halted and I was left suspended in mid read?

As my first Smith her writing lured my interest. The two stories are engaging and, though appended and different, they intertwine through those four elements. Recognizing those elements gives comfort and bliss. Given the twenty views of my spiraling avatar it should not be surprising that her literary double helix, the coiling of her themes, and the pictorial snails added to my reading enjoyment. Smart is also her exploration of complementing or uniting doubles, particularly in sexuality, again at the core of life.

But I found a certain unbalance in the quality of her two narrative strands. The one set in today’s world seemed sturdier. While her 15th Century setting failed to create the texture of the Italian Renaissance. For authenticity she has peppered her story with quotes from Alberti’s On Painting and from Cennini’s The Craftsman's Handbook, both of which I have read, but which felt like Museum stickers in her narrative. She has also included highly apt textual versions of many beautiful paintings, mostly by the one artist who becomes a protagonist. These I have tracked in my updates in what became for me like a delightful detective game in a Museum. But the flavor of the language failed to recreate the aimed “qualitas” and transport me to a past, and now imagined, age.

I hope her other novels stay in the present. Smith knows how to capture this.

Reviewed by Kalliope
Kalliope lives in Madrid, Spain.

To Rise Again At A Decent Hour by Joshua Ferris/ Hachette Book

Shortlisted for


Meet Paul C. O’Rourke, DDS. During the day, his instrument of choice is the drill. (“It was one big mouth to me – one big open, straining, gleeking, unhappy, discomfited, slowly decaying mouth.”) Yet during more ruminative times, he continues to drill within himself, seeking the answers to how to move forward in a meaningless world filled with decay.

And then one day, his existential search for meaning shifts into a whole other dimension when a mysterious stranger hijacks his identity on the Internet. Suddenly, Paul is forced into the online world with a website, Facebook page, tweets, and provocative blog comments regarding an obscure religious sect called the Ulms (who claim to be the natural heirs of Amalek from the Old Testament). Their chief belief is NO belief; they believe in nothing but their obligation to doubt God. As Paul soon learns, “Others believe we face a real enemy, an existential threat, in every generation. Every generation must recognize who Amalek is or that generation, and every generation must prepare to fight it any way it can.”

What’s a poor atheist to do? Even Paul’s office manager and former love interest begins to wonder if the postings are really from Paul. And Paul – who worships only the Red Sox – becomes more and more unsettled, remembering misguided affairs and luring temptations with a Catholic woman and a Jewish woman and the rituals and fervor of their faith and their family. 

This seriocomic novel takes on a number of timely and relevant topics: the growing disconnect of generations that are now tethered to their me-machine (i.e., cell phone) instead of to each other. The particular dislocation caused by online identity theft. The difference between an authentic life and an online pretend life. The attraction of the trappings of religion versus the reality of the tribalism and exclusion are inherent in all of them.

As Paul struggles with the knowledge that his invented online version may be a better version than his real self, he reveals the human condition and the search for meaning: how there has to be hope no matter how hopeless. It’s a dazzling feat.

Joshua Ferris has obviously done ample research into the ancient religions and Paul’s exploration of what it means sometimes threatens to hijack the narrative. Still, this absurd yet profound novel is a page turner and reveals the author’s virtuoso talents. The book’s inventiveness turns it into a 5-star read.

Reviewed by Jill Shtulman

Jill Shtulman is the owner of JSA Creative Services LLC, a Chicago-based marketing communications company specializing in the writing of web and print-based content.  She has long been a top reviewer for Amazon and is followed by over 250 readers at GoodReads. She also has blogged for Mostly Fiction. 

Friday, 2 January 2015

The Lives of Others by Neel Mukherjee/ Random House India

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II
Shortlisted for


Neel Mukherjee’s The Lives of Others, being shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize 2014, like his Vodafone Crossword Award 2008 winning debut novel A Life Apart (initially published under the title – Past Continuous), continues the Calcutta (now Kolkata) connections, but this time with a different time frame and in a more ‘focalized’ way. Unlike the Bengal (most particularly, Calcutta) of 1990s in his first novel, his second novel, though offers some significant snapshots from the city’s history (like, the 1943 Bengal famine, the partition and the riots between Muslims and Hindus just before and after it, and the rise to power of the Left Front) focusing particularly on the period from 1966 to 1970 , a turmoil period blistered with events destabilizing the natural rhythm of the middle-class Bengali life – the Naxalite movement, small-scale farmer insurgencies, state atrocity, police-terrorism, violence, under-cover killings, naked blood-shedding, president’s rule and trade unionism. These glimpses into Bengal’s history are achieved through the unfurling of events centered around the family drama of a certain Ghosh family, once at the helm of its prosperity but now its glory being on the wane, on a continuous downward slope.

               The novel begins with a harrowing event of May, 1966, giving readers a jolt: Netai Das, a destitute landless framer, not being able to cope with the difficult times; three years of continuous draught has ditched his family and many others like his into, decapitates his wife and eldest son, strangles his two daughters in quick succession and then kills himself before the spur of remaining energy in his skeletal frame gets deflated. The relevance of this Prologue (yes, Mukherjee has captioned it this way) becomes clear only when one goes through the family scion, Supratik’s epistolary memoirs of his revolutionary days in the hinterlands of south-west part of Medinipur district, and finds him contextualizing it in the larger framework of years-long exploitation of the people occupying the lowest rung of the society by the Zamindars and their consolidating ancillary agencies, and also in the contexts of the dialectics of Naxalite insurgency, of armed revolution. However, this gory sight of the Prologue is set in contrast, in the following chapter, with the petty concerns in the lives of the Ghosh’s, a well-off family living in a four-storey house in Bhowanipur, South Calcutta. After a few chapters, it becomes obvious that the novel consists of two contrasting but intersecting narratives, producing sometimes dramatic convergences.

               One strand presents the regular opera of/in the lives of the Ghoshes – their aspirations, botched-up dreams, tragedies, hypocrisies, cruelties, viciousness, philistinism, acquisitiveness, perversion and familial fall-outs. Headed by Prafullanath and Charubala, the family has made a good fortune in their paper manufacturing business, acquired enough capital to branch out their business in other areas like publishing sector and owns personal cars. The heads of the family with their sons, daughter, daughter-in-laws, grandchildren and faithful servants ‘seem’ to lead a comfortable middle-class life with its middle-class moralities and mentalities. But as the narrative moves forward with its occasional flash-backs, it emerges that behind the veneer of comfortable life, something reeking really exists which starts surfacing very unpleasantly at the strained, depressed hours in the lives of both the state and this particular family. The exploitative hierarchy of the ‘outside world’ appears to be very much present inside the house in its unequal distribution of shares of the house, of the business, and most prominently when, after the ‘tragic’ death of Somnath, the youngest son of Prafullanath and Charubala, his wife, Purba, with her son and daughter, is forced to live in a dingy room of the ground floor and is treated almost as a servant. Under the joint weight of the changing political scenario and their own dysfunctions coupled with internecine problems and suspicion, the vast Ghosh empire starts dwindling, crumpling and disintegrating. The paper mills are shut down; and the Ghoshes face unimaginable situations. Prafullanath and his sons, Adinath and Priyonath start blaming each other for such a financially strained situation. A dense cloud of gloom, tragedy and mishap seems to hang over the family: Prafullanath gets heart-attack for the second time that almost renders him an invalid; Sandhya, Adinath’s wife, who has been the cohesive force in the family, is left heart-broken and takes to bed once Supratik, their eldest son, leaves the house to join the Naxalite revolutionaries and Suranjan, their youngest, takes to addiction; Chhaya, Prafullanath and Charubala’s unmarried daughter remains involved in an interminable fall-out with her sister-in-law, Purnima, Priyonath’s wife; Priya and Purnima’s daughter Baishakhi brings shame to the family when caught red-handed in a romantic liaison with the neighboring Dutta-lad; Bholanath, Prafullanath’s third son, incurs huge loss in the publishing sector . No longer can the centre hold; the Ghosh Family seems to fall apart. The only sunshine in this suffocating gloom is Sona, Purba’s genius son who is whisked away by Standford University for his sheer skill in mathematics and who ultimately wins the Fields Medal and rescues his mother from her pitiful situation.

               The other strand relates the various strands of experiences Supratik gathers as a revolutionary soldier. In 1967 when Naxalite insurgency starts, Supratik, like many other middle-class educated students, feels for the ‘others’, for the exploited section of peasants and sharecroppers, and leaves his houses and college to join the revolutionary band and mobilize the people into armed revolution in the hope of better world. He moves to the rural Medinipur, stays there for two and a half years, ‘staging’ the party-laid-down tasks and remaining an incognito to his family for all these years. But during these days, he composes a series of letters to an unidentified addressee who, it is revealed later on, is none other than his ‘chhoto-kaki’, widowed aunt, Purba with whom he is in love. Of course, these letters never get sent to their addressee. But it is through these letters only that we come to know about their activities and the lives of the ‘others’. It is important to note how Supratik problematizes the concept by altering the location of the self in respect to shifting ‘other’. However, his return to the family, when it has been in a critical condition, on the verge of breaking-down almost, does not ameliorate the situation; rather his activities bring tragedy in the life of the old, faithful household servant, Madan, and destroy his own life too. The graphic details with which Mukherjee has described the sheer brutality inflicted on Supratik by the state-police reminds me of Animesh in Samares Majumdar’s Kalbela. Of course, there Animesh never dies.

Mukherjee has maintained a sense of detachment on his part. Probably this detachment on his part has provided him the much-needed vantage position to lodge criticism against the violence, killings, meaningless blood-shedding by both the revolutionaries and the state-sponsored agencies. He never forgets to show that these ideology-fed revolutionaries like Supratik and his comrades leave behind them unmistakable trails of ruin, ruin of the very people they think they are working for. And regarding detachment, it must be mentioned that this detachment does not mean any dearth of imagination in Mukherjee. Rather he possesses a queer sort of capability of imagination, of delving deep into other people’s consciousness, to present evenly the points-of-view of both the sides. Probably this has become instrumental for Mukherjee to create a ‘heteroglossic’ world. The graphic detailing of everything, undulating between harshness and pictorial poeticism of things, keeps a reader glued to the text. And, the continual deferment for a certain period, then revelation of ‘links’ one by one and the continual shifting of narrative voice in the narration engage the reader more intensely.

Another thing to be noted, the gruesome event of the Prologue is balanced by the horrendous possibility of an impending large-scale mass-killing when, in the epilogue, a band of Maoist, in the breachless dark, removes the fishplate and slips into darkness again with the full knowledge that an express train is going to hurtle down the track shortly. When I read it, a sense of terror seized me because it was exactly the way, later it was found out, that a horrible accident – Gyaneshari Train Accident – happened in May, 2010 between Jhargram Railway Station and Kharagpur Jn.. And the Maoists were said to be involved in it. I freezed at the thought of what horrible kind of purchase it would have. However, before I conclude, I must add that when I came across the names of the places like Jhargram, Belpahari, Gopiballavpur – all those places very much familiar to me since I hail from a rural place in that very Jhargram subdivision – I got seized with mischievousness to verify the accuracy of those places and conditions. When Mukhejee is successful in depicting the places and its natural fecundities and barrenness, its economic slackness, he succumbs to the habit of stereotyping, in some places, of their inhabitants. The stereotypical images of Santhal men and women are sure to remind one of Sunil Gangopadhyay’s Aranyer Din Ratri. Barring all such trivial shortcomings, this book by Mukherjee is engaging throughout and remains true to what Amitav Ghosh, in his review of the novel, has to say of it – “The Lives of Other is searing, savage and deeply moving: an unforgettably vivid picture of a time of turmoil.”

Reviewed by Soumen Jana

Research Scholar, Department of English, Vidyasagar University, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India

The Wake by Paul Kingsnorth/ Unbound Publishers

Reviews, Vol I, Issue II

Blurb: 
Everyone knows the date of the Battle of Hastings. Far fewer people know what happened next...
Set in the three years after the Norman invasion, ‘The Wake’ tells the story of a fractured band of guerilla fighters who take up arms against the invaders. Carefully hung on the known historical facts about the almost forgotten war of resistance that spread across England in the decade after 1066, it is a story of the brutal shattering of lives, a tale of lost gods and haunted visions, narrated by a man of the Lincolnshire fens bearing witness to the end of his world. Written in what the author describes as 'a shadow tongue' - a version of Old English updated so as to be understandable for the modern reader - The Wake renders the inner life of an Anglo-Saxon man with an accuracy and immediacy rare in historical fiction. To enter Buccmaster's world is to feel powerfully the sheer strangeness of the past.

The worldwide readership was immediately drawn towards Paul Kingnorth’s The Wake after the announcement of Man Booker 2014 longlist.

A novel needs to be unique enough to enter the race of Man-Booker, undoubtedly. Hence, the distinctiveness of The Wake doesn’t need a claim. The first and most unique element of this novel is embedded in its language. Written in a version of Old English cleverly created by the author for layman readers, it gives a first-hand surprise. Although, one thing is clear that Paul Kingsnorth didn't write this novel intending it to be a chore for the reader.  He has written it this way to reflect the world it takes place in, and he has done so beautifully. The story is fascinatingly alien, and utterly relevant to a time we can only try and imagine. Kingsnorth in the note on his language fascinatingly says:

"The way we speak is specific to our time and place. Our assumptions, our politics, our worldview, our attitudes - all are implicit in our words, and what we do with them. To put 21st-century sentences into the mouths of eleventh century characters would be the equivalent of giving them iPads and cappuccinos: just wrong."

He is correct. Reading modern morals in a character of historical fiction seems out of context and annoying as well. Same is with Kingsnorth too, but by taking the brilliant extra steps with language he has created something magical. Once you pick up on the "rules" of the language, reading it becomes second nature. It nourishes the story, never detracting from the tale. There is a partial glossary in the back, for the ease of readers. Kingsnorth has done all the hard work for his readers, and one may find joy in understanding his new words through context. 

Set during the Norman invasion of England, the story follows Buccmaster, and his somewhat misguided attempt to bring England back to what it used to be. Buccmaster is cocky, outspoken, and probably schizophrenic, but oddly riveting in an endearing sort of way; except for the homicidal tendencies, of course. But it's 1066, and his entire world is in turmoil. The voyage is gloomy, but dreamy, and it is sad to see it end. Not that the readers start expecting otherwise, but this one catches off guard. One of the best historical fictions yet, it brings exciting new breath to the genre and a new hope to literature.

Reviewed by Varsha Singh

Managing Editor, Reviews